Featured
Table of Contents
Both propose to eliminate the ability to "forum shop" by omitting a debtor's place of incorporation from the venue analysis, andalarming to international debtorsexcluding money or cash equivalents from the "primary assets" formula. In addition, any equity interest in an affiliate will be deemed located in the exact same location as the principal.
Generally, this testimony has actually been focused on questionable third celebration release provisions carried out in current mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Young Boy Scouts of America, and numerous Catholic diocese bankruptcies. These arrangements often force financial institutions to release non-debtor 3rd celebrations as part of the debtor's plan of reorganization, although such releases are arguably not permitted, at least in some circuits, by the Bankruptcy Code.
A Checklist for Vetting 2026 Debt Relief OrganizationsIn effort to stamp out this habits, the proposed legislation claims to limit "online forum shopping" by prohibiting entities from filing in any venue except where their home office or primary physical assetsexcluding cash and equity interestsare situated. Seemingly, these costs would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other US districts, and guide cases far from the preferred courts in New york city, Delaware and Texas.
Regardless of their admirable purpose, these proposed amendments might have unanticipated and potentially adverse consequences when viewed from an international restructuring prospective. While congressional testimony and other commentators assume that venue reform would merely ensure that domestic companies would file in a various jurisdiction within the US, it is a distinct possibility that global debtors might pass on the US Personal bankruptcy Courts entirely.
Without the factor to consider of cash accounts as an opportunity toward eligibility, many foreign corporations without concrete properties in the United States might not certify to submit a Chapter 11 personal bankruptcy in any United States jurisdiction. Second, even if they do qualify, worldwide debtors may not be able to count on access to the typical and practical reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Provided the complex issues often at play in a worldwide restructuring case, this might trigger the debtor and financial institutions some unpredictability. This uncertainty, in turn, might motivate global debtors to file in their own nations, or in other more beneficial nations, instead. Especially, this proposed location reform comes at a time when many nations are imitating the US and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which stressed liquidation, the new Code's goal is to restructure and preserve the entity as a going concern. Thus, debt restructuring contracts might be approved with as little as 30 percent approval from the overall debt. However, unlike the United States, Italy's new Code will not include an automated stay of enforcement actions by financial institutions.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the country's approval of 3rd party release provisions. In Canada, companies generally reorganize under the standard insolvency statutes of the Business' Creditors Arrangement Act (). 3rd party releases under the CCAAwhile fiercely objected to in the USare a common element of restructuring strategies.
The current court decision makes clear, though, that regardless of the CBCA's more limited nature, third celebration release arrangements might still be acceptable. Companies might still get themselves of a less troublesome restructuring available under the CBCA, while still getting the benefits of 3rd party releases. Efficient as of January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act Upon Court Confirmation of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has produced a debtor-in-possession treatment performed beyond formal bankruptcy procedures.
Effective as of January 1, 2021, Germany's brand-new Act on the Stabilization and Restructuring Structure for Companies offers pre-insolvency restructuring proceedings. Prior to its enactment, German companies had no choice to restructure their financial obligations through the courts. Now, distressed companies can hire German courts to reorganize their financial obligations and otherwise protect the going issue value of their company by utilizing many of the very same tools available in the United States, such as keeping control of their organization, imposing pack down restructuring strategies, and executing collection moratoriums.
Influenced by Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, this brand-new structure streamlines the debtor-in-possession restructuring procedure mostly in effort to assist small and medium sized businesses. While previous law was long criticized as too pricey and too complicated because of its "one size fits all" approach, this brand-new legislation integrates the debtor in possession model, and attends to a structured liquidation process when required In June 2020, the UK enacted the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Notably, CIGA provides for a collection moratorium, invalidates particular arrangements of pre-insolvency agreements, and permits entities to propose an arrangement with shareholders and creditors, all of which allows the development of a cram-down strategy similar to what might be achieved under Chapter 11 of the US Personal Bankruptcy Code. In 2017, Singapore adopted enacted the Business (Amendment) Act 2017 (Singapore), that made major legislative modifications to the restructuring provisions of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As a result, the law has substantially improved the restructuring tools readily available in Singapore courts and moved Singapore as a leading hub for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In May of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Insolvency Code, which completely overhauled the bankruptcy laws in India. This legislation looks for to incentivize additional financial investment in the country by supplying greater certainty and efficiency to the restructuring procedure.
Provided these recent changes, international debtors now have more choices than ever. Even without the proposed restrictions on eligibility, foreign entities might less need to flock to the United States as previously. Even more, need to the US' venue laws be changed to avoid simple filings in particular practical and useful places, international debtors may begin to consider other areas.
Unique thanks to Dallas associate Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this material under the guidance of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles workplace.
Customer bankruptcy filings increased 9% in January 2026 compared to January 2025, with 44,282 consumer filings that month alone. Commercial filings jumped 49% year-over-year the greatest January level since 2018. The numbers reflect what financial obligation experts call "slow-burn monetary stress" that's been developing for several years. If you're struggling, you're not an outlier.
Customer personal bankruptcy filings amounted to 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Commercial filings struck 1,378 a 49% year-over-year jump and the greatest January commercial filing level since 2018. For all of 2025, customer filings grew nearly 14%.
Latest Posts
Preventing Foreclosure Through Housing Counseling
Learn Your Consumer Rights Against Debt Collectors
Strategies to Restore Your Credit in 2026

